🤖 AI Summary
In deep search tasks, sparse global rewards hinder reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR), leading to high exploration costs and low learning efficiency.
Method: This paper proposes a reward density optimization framework that decomposes sparse global rewards into dense subtask process rewards. It introduces failure-guided prompting and a dual-agent collaboration mechanism—where a “Researcher” agent explores while a “Refiner” agent corrects errors—and incorporates search history compression and failure trajectory correction strategies.
Contribution/Results: The framework is the first to systematically increase reward density per unit exploration cost. It achieves significant performance gains over strong baselines across multiple agent-based search benchmarks. Notably, lightweight large language models (LLMs) equipped with this framework match the search performance of state-of-the-art proprietary large models, demonstrating its scalability and efficiency.
📝 Abstract
Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) is a promising approach for enhancing agentic deep search. However, its application is often hindered by low extbf{Reward Density} in deep search scenarios, where agents expend significant exploratory costs for infrequent and often null final rewards. In this paper, we formalize this challenge as the extbf{Reward Density Optimization} problem, which aims to improve the reward obtained per unit of exploration cost. This paper introduce extbf{InfoFlow}, a systematic framework that tackles this problem from three aspects. 1) extbf{Subproblem decomposition}: breaking down long-range tasks to assign process rewards, thereby providing denser learning signals. 2) extbf{Failure-guided hints}: injecting corrective guidance into stalled trajectories to increase the probability of successful outcomes. 3) extbf{Dual-agent refinement}: employing a dual-agent architecture to offload the cognitive burden of deep exploration. A refiner agent synthesizes the search history, which effectively compresses the researcher's perceived trajectory, thereby reducing exploration cost and increasing the overall reward density. We evaluate InfoFlow on multiple agentic search benchmarks, where it significantly outperforms strong baselines, enabling lightweight LLMs to achieve performance comparable to advanced proprietary LLMs.