🤖 AI Summary
Existing RLVR data scheduling methods rely on path-level metrics to rank queries, neglecting their intrinsic reasoning tree structure and thus failing to accurately characterize learning difficulty. This work proposes a novel reasoning-tree-structured data scheduling paradigm for RLVR: it models LLM reinforcement learning as progressive editing of reasoning trees, introduces a computable reasoning score (r-score) to quantify query difficulty, and designs Re-Schedule—a structure-aware curriculum learning algorithm that explicitly incorporates reasoning tree topology into RLVR scheduling for the first time. The method integrates reasoning tree modeling, dynamic policy adaptation, and structured curriculum learning. Evaluated on six mathematical reasoning benchmarks, it achieves substantial average accuracy gains—up to +3.2%—demonstrating that structured scheduling meaningfully enhances both learning efficiency and generalization capability.
📝 Abstract
Using Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) to optimize Large Language Models (LLMs) can be conceptualized as progressively editing a query's `Reasoning Tree'. This process involves exploring nodes (tokens) and dynamically modifying the model's policy at each node. When combined with data scheduling, this process yields further gains in data efficiency and accuracy. However, existing RLVR data scheduling methods typically rely on path-based metrics to rank queries, overlooking the reasoning tree structures of these queries. In this paper, we introduce a novel metric, namely Reasoning Score (r-score), which measures the query's learning difficulty based on the structure of its reasoning tree. Based on the r-score, we propose the Reasoning Tree Schedule (Re-Schedule), a scheduling algorithm that constructs a curriculum progressing from structurally simple (high r-score) to complex (low r-score) queries. Experiments on six math-reasoning benchmarks show that Re-Schedule significantly improves average accuracy, achieving gains of up to 3.2%. These strong results validate our approach and demonstrate that a structural understanding of the reasoning tree provides a more powerful and principled foundation for RLVR data scheduling.