🤖 AI Summary
To address the degradation of prediction probability calibration in deployed image classification models due to concept drift, this paper proposes an online calibration monitoring method that requires no access to model internals—only predicted probabilities and ground-truth labels. Our approach introduces, for the first time, a Cumulative Sum (CUSUM) control chart with dynamic control limits into calibration monitoring. It computes cumulative deviations of calibration error over time and adaptively adjusts detection thresholds to enable early warning of calibration loss. Compared to static-threshold methods, our framework significantly enhances sensitivity to temporal distribution shifts and accelerates response to emerging miscalibration. We validate its effectiveness and robustness across multiple image classification benchmarks under diverse concept drift scenarios. The proposed method establishes a scalable, black-box-compatible paradigm for trustworthy model deployment, enabling continuous, lightweight calibration assessment without architectural or training modifications.
📝 Abstract
Machine learning approaches for image classification have led to impressive advances in that field. For example, convolutional neural networks are able to achieve remarkable image classification accuracy across a wide range of applications in industry, defense, and other areas. While these machine learning models boast impressive accuracy, a related concern is how to assess and maintain calibration in the predictions these models make. A classification model is said to be well calibrated if its predicted probabilities correspond with the rates events actually occur. While there are many available methods to assess machine learning calibration and recalibrate faulty predictions, less effort has been spent on developing approaches that continually monitor predictive models for potential loss of calibration as time passes. We propose a cumulative sum-based approach with dynamic limits that enable detection of miscalibration in both traditional process monitoring and concept drift applications. This enables early detection of operational context changes that impact image classification performance in the field. The proposed chart can be used broadly in any situation where the user needs to monitor probability predictions over time for potential lapses in calibration. Importantly, our method operates on probability predictions and event outcomes and does not require under-the-hood access to the machine learning model.