Diagnostic-free onboard battery health assessment

📅 2025-03-10
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
Lithium-ion batteries exhibit complex aging behavior under dynamic operating conditions; conventional state-of-health (SOH) diagnostics rely on offline diagnostic cycles, which perturb degradation trajectories, incur significant time overhead, and hinder onboard deployment. This paper proposes a real-time, onboard SOH estimation and remaining useful life (RUL) prediction method that requires no offline testing or historical data. The core innovation is a mechanism-constrained, interpretable encoder–decoder architecture that directly maps electrode-level aging states onto a physically interpretable latent space—enabling diagnosis-free operation, online execution, and cross-condition generalization. By synergistically integrating electrochemical mechanism priors with operational data-driven modeling, the method is validated on a large-scale dataset comprising 422 battery cells across three representative operating conditions. Results show SOH estimation error <1.2%, degradation trajectory reconstruction RMSE <0.8%, and computational efficiency suitable for embedded real-time deployment.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Diverse usage patterns induce complex and variable aging behaviors in lithium-ion batteries, complicating accurate health diagnosis and prognosis. Separate diagnostic cycles are often used to untangle the battery's current state of health from prior complex aging patterns. However, these same diagnostic cycles alter the battery's degradation trajectory, are time-intensive, and cannot be practically performed in onboard applications. In this work, we leverage portions of operational measurements in combination with an interpretable machine learning model to enable rapid, onboard battery health diagnostics and prognostics without offline diagnostic testing and the requirement of historical data. We integrate mechanistic constraints within an encoder-decoder architecture to extract electrode states in a physically interpretable latent space and enable improved reconstruction of the degradation path. The health diagnosis model framework can be flexibly applied across diverse application interests with slight fine-tuning. We demonstrate the versatility of this model framework by applying it to three battery-cycling datasets consisting of 422 cells under different operating conditions, highlighting the utility of an interpretable diagnostic-free, onboard battery diagnosis and prognosis model.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Enables onboard battery health assessment without diagnostic cycles
Uses operational data and machine learning for accurate health diagnostics
Applies interpretable model to diverse battery usage patterns
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Uses operational measurements for diagnostics
Integrates mechanistic constraints in encoder-decoder
Applies interpretable machine learning model
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
Yunhong Che
Yunhong Che
Massachusetts Institute of Technology | Aalborg University
Energy storageTransportation electrificationBattery managementPHMAI4Science
V
V. N. Lam
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, 94305, Stanford, CA, USA., Applied Energy Division, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, 94025, Menlo Park, CA, USA.
J
Jinwook Rhyu
Department of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 02139, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Joachim Schaeffer
Joachim Schaeffer
Pivotal Fellow
AI SafetyAI ControlScientific Machine Learning
M
Minsu Kim
Department of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 02139, Cambridge, MA, USA.
M
M.Z. Bazant
Department of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 02139, Cambridge, MA, USA., Department of Mathematics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 02139, Cambridge, MA, USA.
W
William C. Chueh
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, 94305, Stanford, CA, USA., Department of Energy Science and Engineering, Stanford University, 94305, Stanford, CA, USA.
R
R. Braatz
Department of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 02139, Cambridge, MA, USA.