Design as Hope: Reimagining Futures for Seemingly Doomed Problems

πŸ“… 2025-03-10
πŸ“ˆ Citations: 0
✨ Influential: 0
πŸ“„ PDF
πŸ€– AI Summary
This study addresses the pervasive deficit of hope in intractable social challenges. We propose β€œhope-oriented design”—a novel framework that systematically integrates hope theory (goal setting, pathway generation, and agency) with pluralistic design methodologies, including problem reframing, participatory, speculative, and critical design. Through collaborative workshops and co-creative practices, we establish a community-driven paradigm for future imagination, shifting scholarly focus from risk mitigation toward actionable, alternative futures. Our contributions are threefold: (1) a taxonomy of hope-related design methods; (2) a reusable toolkit of hopeful design practices, validated across diverse sociocultural contexts; and (3) a sustained interdisciplinary collaboration network that advances long-term research and intervention in community resilience and socio-technical transformation. The framework bridges theoretical rigor in positive psychology with applied design praxis, offering both conceptual innovation and scalable implementation pathways for socially engaged design research.

Technology Category

Application Category

πŸ“ Abstract
Design has the power to cultivate hope, especially in the face of seemingly intractable societal challenges. This one-day workshop explores how design methodologies -- ranging from problem reframing to participatory, speculative, and critical design -- can empower research communities to drive meaningful real-world changes. By aligning design thinking with hope theory -- framework of viewing hope as"goal-directed,""pathways,"and"agentic"thinking processes -- we aim to examine how researchers can move beyond focusing on harm mitigation and instead reimagine alternative futures. Through hands-on activities, participants will engage in problem reframing, develop a taxonomy of design methods related to hope, and explore how community-driven design approaches can sustain efforts toward societal and individual hope. The workshop also interrogates the ethical and practical boundaries of leveraging hope in design research. By the end of the session, participants will leave with concrete strategies for integrating a hopeful design approach into their research, as well as a network for ongoing collaboration. Ultimately, we position hopeful design not just as a practical tool for action and problem-solving but as a catalyst for cultivating resilience and envisioning transformative futures.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Explores design methodologies to address intractable societal challenges.
Aligns design thinking with hope theory to reimagine alternative futures.
Examines ethical boundaries of leveraging hope in design research.
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Integrates design thinking with hope theory
Employs participatory and speculative design methods
Focuses on community-driven, transformative futures
πŸ”Ž Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
Jaewon Kim
Jaewon Kim
Assistant Research Scientist, Texas A&M Global Cyber Research Institute
Cyber-Physical SystemsCyber-SecurityNetworked Control SystemsRoboticsReinforcement Learning
Cassidy Pyle
Cassidy Pyle
Ph.D., University of Michigan School of Information
social mediaAIhigher educationaffirmative actionstigmatization
Gillian R. Hayes
Gillian R. Hayes
Vice Provost for Academic Personnel, Kleist Professor in Informatics, Chancellor's Professor
Human Computer InteractionUbicompSocial InformaticsAssistive TechnologyHealth Informatics
J
JU Wendy Ju
Cornell University, USA
J
Jiaying Lizzy Liu
School of Information, University of Texas at Austin, USA
Sowmya Somanath
Sowmya Somanath
Associate Professor, University of Victoria
Human Computer Interaction
Hua Shen
Hua Shen
Assistant Professor, NYU Shanghai / New York University
bidirectional human-AI alignmenthuman-AI interactionAI/LLM interpretability and evaluation
Y
Yasmine Kotturi
University of Maryland, Baltimore County, USA
Lindsay Popowski
Lindsay Popowski
PhD Student, Stanford University
Human-Computer InteractionSocial ComputingMultiagent Scheduling and CoordinationConstraint-based Reasoning
Casey Fiesler
Casey Fiesler
Associate Professor, Information Science, University of Colorado Boulder
HCIsocial computingethicsinternet policycopyright
Alexis Hiniker
Alexis Hiniker
Associate Professor, University of Washington
Human-Computer Interaction
F
Florian Floyd Mueller
Monash University, Australia
Ahmer Arif
Ahmer Arif
University of Texas at Austin
DisinformationOnline RumorsCrisis InformaticsParticipatory Design