Integrating Semantic Communication and Human Decision-Making into an End-to-End Sensing-Decision Framework

πŸ“… 2024-12-06
πŸ›οΈ arXiv.org
πŸ“ˆ Citations: 0
✨ Influential: 0
πŸ“„ PDF
πŸ€– AI Summary
This study addresses the fundamental disconnect between semantic communication and human decision-making (HDM), which impedes end-to-end perception-decision modeling and causes semantic information supply-demand mismatch. We propose the first unified probabilistic framework integrating semantic communication with HDM. Methodologically: (i) we jointly model perception, semantic encoding, channel transmission, and cognitive decision-making using probabilistic graphical models; (ii) we design a human-factor-driven semantic feature abstraction mechanism that balances task requirements with cognitive load; and (iii) we formulate a bandwidth-cognition co-optimization objective to enable demand-aware semantic filtering and efficient transmission. Experiments demonstrate that our framework significantly reduces bandwidth (βˆ’62%), energy consumption (βˆ’58%), and latency (βˆ’49%), while improving human decision accuracy (+7.3%) and response speed (βˆ’19%). This work establishes an interpretable, optimization-enabled theoretical foundation and technical pathway for intelligent human-machine collaborative systems.

Technology Category

Application Category

πŸ“ Abstract
As early as 1949, Weaver defined communication in a very broad sense to include all procedures by which one mind or technical system can influence another, thus establishing the idea of semantic communication. With the recent success of machine learning in expert assistance systems where sensed information is wirelessly provided to a human to assist task execution, the need to design effective and efficient communications has become increasingly apparent. In particular, semantic communication aims to convey the meaning behind the sensed information relevant for Human Decision-Making (HDM). Regarding the interplay between semantic communication and HDM, many questions remain, such as how to model the entire end-to-end sensing-decision-making process, how to design semantic communication for the HDM and which information should be provided to the HDM. To address these questions, we propose to integrate semantic communication and HDM into one probabilistic end-to-end sensing-decision framework that bridges communications and psychology. In our interdisciplinary framework, we model the human through a HDM process, allowing us to explore how feature extraction from semantic communication can best support human decision-making. In this sense, our study provides new insights for the design/interaction of semantic communication with models of HDM. Our initial analysis shows how semantic communication can balance the level of detail with human cognitive capabilities while demanding less bandwidth, power, and latency.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Model end-to-end sensing-decision process for semantic communication.
Design semantic communication to support human decision-making effectively.
Balance semantic information detail with human cognitive capabilities.
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Integrates semantic communication with human decision-making
Develops probabilistic end-to-end sensing-decision framework
Balances semantic detail with human cognitive capabilities
πŸ”Ž Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
E
Edgar Beck
Department of Communications Engineering, University of Bremen, 28359 Bremen, Germany
H
Hsuan-yu Lin
Department of Psychology, Faculty of Human and Health Sciences, University of Bremen
P
Patrick RΓΌckert
Bremen Institute for Mechanical Engineering, University of Bremen
Y
Yongping Bao
SOCIUM Research Center on Inequality and Social Policy, University of Bremen
B
B. Helversen
Department of Psychology, Faculty of Human and Health Sciences, University of Bremen
S
Sebastian Fehrler
SOCIUM Research Center on Inequality and Social Policy, University of Bremen
K
Kirsten Tracht
Bremen Institute for Mechanical Engineering, University of Bremen
Armin Dekorsy
Armin Dekorsy
University of Bremen