Unifying regression-based and design-based causal inference in time-series experiments

📅 2025-10-26
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This paper addresses the sensitivity of causal effect estimation in time-series experiments—such as switchback designs in healthcare and industrial settings—to regression model misspecification. We propose a unified “design-driven + regression-assisted” causal inference framework that does not rely on correct regression specification; instead, it leverages the randomization inherent in experimental design. By applying covariate transformations followed by ordinary least squares, the framework delivers consistent estimates of treatment effects. It supports simultaneous estimation of multiple treatment effects and remains robust under high-dimensional covariates. We establish asymptotic normality of the estimator and construct a conservative heteroskedasticity- and autocorrelation-robust variance estimator whose asymptotic upper bound dominates the true design-based variance. The proposed method substantially enhances the robustness, broad applicability, and statistical reliability of causal inference in time-series experimental settings.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Time-series experiments, also called switchback experiments or N-of-1 trials, play increasingly important roles in modern applications in medical and industrial areas. Under the potential outcomes framework, recent research has studied time-series experiments from the design-based perspective, relying solely on the randomness in the design to drive the statistical inference. Focusing on simpler statistical methods, we examine the design-based properties of regression-based methods for estimating treatment effects in time-series experiments. We demonstrate that the treatment effects of interest can be consistently estimated using ordinary least squares with an appropriately specified working model and transformed regressors. Our analysis allows for estimating a diverging number of treatment effects simultaneously, and establishes the consistency and asymptotic normality of the regression-based estimators. Additionally, we show that asymptotically, the heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent variance estimators provide conservative estimates of the true, design-based variances. Importantly, although our approach relies on regression, our design-based framework allows for misspecification of the regression model.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Unifying regression-based and design-based causal inference methods
Establishing consistency and asymptotic normality of regression estimators
Allowing model misspecification while maintaining design-based validity
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Uses ordinary least squares with transformed regressors
Allows simultaneous estimation of diverging treatment effects
Provides conservative variance estimates under model misspecification
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
Zhexiao Lin
Zhexiao Lin
University of California, Berkeley
StatisticsCausal InferenceEconometricsDeep Learning
P
Peng Ding
Department of Statistics, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA