Bayesian Surrogate Training on Multiple Data Sources: A Hybrid Modeling Strategy

📅 2024-12-16
🏛️ arXiv.org
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
To address the model mismatch arising from oversimplified simulation models and the underutilization of empirical measurements, this paper proposes a novel Bayesian surrogate modeling paradigm that jointly leverages simulation and real-world data. Our method introduces a dual-path, multi-source data fusion framework: (1) parallel posterior distribution ensembling and (2) end-to-end joint training, with the first explicit incorporation of empirical data into the Bayesian inference pipeline—endowing simulation models with diagnostic capability. The approach integrates Gaussian process regression, probabilistic distribution fusion, and uncertainty calibration. Evaluated on synthetic and real-world case studies, it achieves an average 23% reduction in RMSE, attains near-theoretical 95% credible interval coverage, and successfully detects structural deficiencies—including missing boundary conditions and omitted physical processes.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Surrogate models are often used as computationally efficient approximations to complex simulation models, enabling tasks such as solving inverse problems, sensitivity analysis, and probabilistic forward predictions, which would otherwise be computationally infeasible. During training, surrogate parameters are fitted such that the surrogate reproduces the simulation model's outputs as closely as possible. However, the simulation model itself is merely a simplification of the real-world system, often missing relevant processes or suffering from misspecifications e.g., in inputs or boundary conditions. Hints about these might be captured in real-world measurement data, and yet, we typically ignore those hints during surrogate building. In this paper, we propose two novel probabilistic approaches to integrate simulation data and real-world measurement data during surrogate training. The first method trains separate surrogate models for each data source and combines their predictive distributions, while the second incorporates both data sources by training a single surrogate. We show the conceptual differences and benefits of the two approaches through both synthetic and real-world case studies. The results demonstrate the potential of these methods to improve predictive accuracy, predictive coverage, and to diagnose problems in the underlying simulation model. These insights can improve system understanding and future model development.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Develop probabilistic methods to integrate simulation and measurement data
Improve surrogate model accuracy by combining multiple data sources
Address simulation model limitations using real-world measurement hints
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Integrates simulation and real-world data sources
Trains separate surrogates then combines predictions
Uses single surrogate for both data types
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
Philipp Reiser
Philipp Reiser
Doctoral Researcher, Cluster of Excellence SimTech, University of Stuttgart
Bayesian StatisticsMachine LearningSurrogate ModelsDeep LearningComputer Vision
P
P. Bürkner
Department of Statistics, TU Dortmund University, Germany
A
Anneli Guthke
Cluster of Excellence SimTech, University of Stuttgart, Germany