🤖 AI Summary
Urban transportation systems face significant challenges under disturbances due to high-dimensional performance metrics and strong data heterogeneity, hindering the development of a unified and reliable resilience assessment framework. This work proposes a dynamic multi-layer equilibrium attractor model that distinguishes between a fast-performance layer and a slow-strategic layer, integrating statistical decision rules to enable antifragility classification. It formally characterizes, for the first time, the conditions under which multi-scale equilibrium attractors can be faithfully preserved under low-dimensional projections, proving that dimensionality reduction leads only to a unidirectional underestimation of recovery time. Theoretical guarantees are provided for preserving both Fisher information and decision-making capability. Simulation experiments across three representative urban configurations demonstrate that, within an admissible set of indicators, only two observation channels are sufficient to effectively support antifragility classification.
📝 Abstract
Equilibrium analysis of urban mobility systems is formulated in a high-dimensional indicator space, whilst data availability varies sharply across cities and disruption contexts. This paper gives a formal treatment of that mismatch. It presents a dynamic multi-layer equilibrium attractor for disrupted urban mobility, in which a fast performance layer relaxes towards an indicator-dependent target, a slow strategic layer supplies a joint traffic, modal and learning fixed point, and antifragility is classified through a statistical decision rule on the post-to-baseline performance ratio. It then characterises when a lower-dimensional indicator projection is faithful to this equilibrium structure, establishing four results: conditions for exact and approximate projectability of the attractor with an explicit error bound; preservation of the coupled two-layer fixed point up to a contraction boundary; the retained Fisher information and decision power of any indicator support under a measurement model on observable urban indicators; and a one-sided restoration-time bias, whereby reduced monitoring can only understate recovery duration. A simulation study on three stylised pilot-city configurations verifies each result, and shows that two observable channels suffice for the candidate classification target where the indicator catalogue permits. The framework gives city authorities a principled basis for deciding which indicators must be maintained.