Causal-Adversarial Probing of Clinical Covariates for Prostate MRI Grading

📅 2026-07-16
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
Prostate MRI-based cancer grading models may implicitly rely on clinical covariates that contain both disease-relevant signals and shortcut features detrimental to generalization, yet the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. This work proposes the first framework integrating causal modeling with adversarial probing, treating MRI findings and ISUP grade as observed proxies of an unmeasured pathological latent variable. By adversarially suppressing the decodability of individual covariates while preserving grading performance, the approach disentangles harmful dependencies from useful clinical signals. Evaluated on 2,903 training and 576 external validation cases, the analysis reveals that suppressing age or BMI slightly improves AUC (up to +1.42%), whereas suppressing PSA or prostate volume substantially degrades AUC (up to −7.61%), elucidating the distinct roles of clinical variables in shaping imaging representations and their differential impact on model performance.
📝 Abstract
Deep learning models for prostate MRI-based cancer grading may encode clinical covariates that either reflect useful disease-related signal or non-generalising shortcut information, but their role is usually assumed. We propose a causal-reasoning framework for probing covariate dependence in MRI-based International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Grade Group prediction. Rather than treating mpMRI as a direct cause of grade, we model MRI appearance and ISUP grade as observations of latent tumour pathology, and test whether candidate clinical variables act as nuisance correlates, disease-related proxies, or irrelevant covariates in the learned representation. We implement this using an adversarial framework that suppresses the decodability of individual clinical covariate at a time while preserving MRI-based grade prediction. The approach is developed and evaluated on 2,903 prostate MRI examinations, with external validation on 576 patients. We report a set of interesting and previously under-explored imaging-to-clinical-variable interactions in the context of deep learning generalisation. For examples, in binary ISUP Grade Group $\geq2$ classification, suppressing age, BMI, and alcohol use improved AUC by 1.23%, 0.84%, and 1.42%, respectively (all p < 0.05), suggesting reduced non-generalising covariate information; In contrast, suppressing PSA and prostate volume degraded AUC by 1.91% and 7.61% (all p < 0.001), indicating that these variables carried task-relevant signal. These findings show that adversarial covariate suppression can provide a practical representation-level analysis for distinguishing potentially harmful dependence from informative signal in prostate MRI grading models.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

prostate MRI grading
clinical covariates
causal probing
representation analysis
generalisation
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

causal reasoning
adversarial probing
clinical covariates
prostate MRI grading
representation analysis
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
Y
Yipei Wang
UCL Hawkes Institute, University College London, London, UK
S
Shiqi Huang
UCL Hawkes Institute, University College London, London, UK
W
Wen Yan
UCL Hawkes Institute, University College London, London, UK
W
Weixi Yi
UCL Hawkes Institute, University College London, London, UK
D
Dean C. Barratt
UCL Hawkes Institute, University College London, London, UK
Mark Emberton
Mark Emberton
Professor of Interventional Oncology, University College London, UK
Prostate cancerVoiding dissorderimagingtrial design
Daniel C. Alexander
Daniel C. Alexander
Professor of Imaging Science, Centre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Computer Science
Computer scienceMachine learningMedical imagingdiffusion MRINeuroscience
V
Veeru Kasivisvanathan
Centre for Urology Imaging, Prostate, AI and Surgical Studies (COMPASS) Research Group, Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
Y
Yipeng Hu
UCL Hawkes Institute, University College London, London, UK