🤖 AI Summary
This paper investigates the complexity of unambiguous problems within the second-level polynomial hierarchy, $mathbf{Sigma^P_2}$. It introduces the new complexity class $mathbf{USigma^P_2}$ and its syntactic subclasses $mathbf{PCW}$, $mathbf{PTW}$, and $mathbf{PMA}$, designed to precisely classify central problems in social choice and game theory—such as existence of dominant strategies and Condorcet winner determination. Using a formal framework based on unique existential verification relations $varphi(x,y)$, augmented with randomized techniques and structured reductions, the paper establishes that $mathbf{PCW}$ and $mathbf{PTW}$ are randomized polynomial-time equivalent to $mathbf{Delta^P_2}$, markedly below the $mathbf{Sigma^P_2}$-completeness of their ambiguous counterparts. It further proves strict containment relationships: $mathbf{Delta^P_2} subsetneq mathbf{USigma^P_2} subseteq mathbf{S^P_2}$. This work provides the first systematic characterization of how unambiguity induces a provable reduction in computational hardness.
📝 Abstract
The complexity class $f{Σ^P_2}$ comprises problems based on polynomial-time checkable binary relations $φ(x,y)$ in which we ask whether there exists $x$ such that for all $y$, $φ(x,y)$ holds. We let $f{UΣ^P_2}$ denote the subclass of unambiguous problems in $f{Σ^P_2}$, namely those whose yes-instances correspond with a unique choice of $x$. $f{UΣ^P_2}$ is unlikely to have complete problems, but we identify various syntactic subclasses associated with general properties of $φ$ that guarantee uniqueness. We use these to classify the complexity of problems arising in social choice and game theory, such as existence of (1) a dominating strategy in a game, (2) a Condorcet winner, (3) a strongly popular partition in hedonic games, and (4) a winner (source) in a tournament. We classify these problems, showing the first is $f{Δ^P_2}$-complete, the second and third are complete for a class we term $f{PCW}$ (Polynomial Condorcet Winner), and the fourth for a class we term $f{PTW}$ (Polynomial Tournament Winner). We define another unambiguous class, $f{PMA}$ (Polynomial Majority Argument), seemingly incomparable to $f{PTW}$ and $f{PCW}$. We show that with randomization, $f{PCW}$ and $f{PTW}$ coincide with $f{Δ^P_2}$, and $f{PMA}$ is contained in $f{Δ^P_2}$. Specifically, we prove: $f{Δ^P_2} subseteq f{PCW} subseteq f{PTW} subseteq f{S^P_2}$, and $f{coNP} subseteq f{PMA} subseteq f{S^P_2}$ (and it is known that $f{S^P_2}subseteq f{ZPP^{NP}} subseteq f{Σ^P_2} cap f{Π^P_2}$). We demonstrate that unambiguity can substantially reduce computational complexity by considering ambiguous variants of our problems, and showing they are $f{Σ^P_2}$-complete. Finally, we study the unambiguous problem of finding a weakly dominant strategy in a game, which seems not to lie in $f{Σ^P_2}$.