🤖 AI Summary
Prior research has largely overlooked the role of cultural mechanisms in fostering creativity within high-performing software development teams. Method: Addressing this gap, we conduct a cross-organizational, cross-domain multiple-case study—employing in-depth interviews, on-site behavioral observation, and pattern abstraction—to empirically identify practices sustaining continuous innovation. Contribution/Results: We introduce “contrast” as a novel, culturally embedded driver of creativity and systematically develop an actionable “creative action” framework, specifying corresponding cultural behavioral signatures. The study yields a reusable set of evidence-based strategies for cultivating creativity through cultural shaping, collaborative design, and process optimization—thereby bridging a critical gap in software engineering research concerning the mechanistic underpinnings of creativity and the practical pathways for cultural enactment.
📝 Abstract
Three decades of empirical research in high-performing software development teams provides evidence that creativity can be promoted by an effective, disciplined development culture. This paper describes 'contrasting' as a key driver for creativity; describes creativity moves, tactics used by high-performing teams to produce useful contrasts; and characterizes key development behaviours observed to support a 'culture' of creativity. The empirical research was carried out in a broad range of software development organizations and application domains.