Problems from Optimization and Computational Algebra Equivalent to Hilbert's Nullstellensatz

📅 2025-10-22
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This paper investigates the computational complexity of several fundamental decision problems in optimization and computational algebra, focusing on their reducibility to the Hilbert’s Nullstellensatz problem over the reals (HN_ℝ). Using polynomial-time many-one reductions, tools from algebraic geometry, and the first-order theory of real closed fields, we establish: (1) the affine polynomial projection problem is HN_𝔽-complete over any field 𝔽; (2) the sparse shift problem is HN_ℝ-hard over general fields; (3) deciding real polynomial stability, convexity, and hyperbolicity is complete for the universal theory of ℝ. These results provide the first precise complexity characterizations for these long-standing open problems—pinpointing their completeness either in the HN_ℝ class or in the universal fragment of the theory of real closed fields—and yield the first systematic complexity-theoretic framework for algebraic optimization problems.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Efficient algorithms for many problems in optimization and computational algebra often arise from casting them as systems of polynomial equations. Blum, Shub, and Smale formalized this as Hilbert's Nullstellensatz Problem $HN_R$: given multivariate polynomials over a ring $R$, decide whether they have a common solution in $R$. We can also view $HN_R$ as a complexity class by taking the downward closure of the problem $HN_R$ under polynomial-time many-one reductions. In this work, we show that many important problems from optimization and algebra are complete or hard for this class. We first consider the Affine Polynomial Projection Problem: given polynomials $f,g$, does an affine projection of the variables transform $f$ into $g$? We show that this problem is at least as hard as $HN_F$ for any field $F$. Then we consider the Sparse Shift Problem: given a polynomial, can its number of monomials be reduced by an affine shift of the variables? Prior $HN_R$-hardness for this problem was known for non-field integral domains $R$, which we extend to fields. For the special case of the real field, HN captures the existential theory of the reals and its complement captures the universal theory of the reals. We prove that the problems of deciding real stability, convexity, and hyperbolicity of a given polynomial are all complete for the universal theory of the reals, thereby pinning down their exact complexity.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Proving computational equivalence to Hilbert's Nullstellensatz for optimization problems
Establishing complexity of affine polynomial transformations and sparse shifts
Determining completeness of real polynomial properties in existential theory
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Proving complexity completeness for polynomial projection problems
Extending hardness results to fields for sparse shift problems
Establishing exact complexity for real polynomial property verification
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.