Regional heterogeneity in left atrial stiffness impacts passive deformation in a cohort of patient-specific models

📅 2025-10-21
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
The biomechanical mechanisms underlying left atrial (LA) dysfunction in atrial fibrillation (AF) remain poorly understood, particularly regarding the quantitative role of regional myocardial stiffness heterogeneity. To address this, we developed a patient-specific LA biomechanical model reconstructed from clinical CT imaging, integrating regionally calibrated material parameters with dynamic, image-derived deformation data for model validation and refinement. Our analysis—first to quantitatively isolate regional stiffness effects—demonstrates that spatially varying wall stiffness is the dominant determinant of passive LA deformation, exerting significantly greater influence than anatomical factors such as wall thickness or adipose volume. The model achieves high fidelity: mean geometric error of ±0.90 mm in static deformation and transient response deviation ≤±0.38 mm/unit time, successfully recapitulating clinically observed dynamics. This work establishes a novel mechanistic framework for AF-associated LA functional remodeling and introduces a generalizable paradigm for personalized atrial modeling.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
The deformation of the left atrium (LA), or its biomechanical function, is closely linked to the health of this cardiac chamber. In atrial fibrillation (AF), atrial biomechanics are significantly altered but the underlying cause of this change is not always clear. Patient-specific models of the LA that replicate patient atrial motion can allow us to understand how factors such as atrial anatomy, myocardial stiffness and physiological constraints are linked to atrial biomechanics. We created patient-specific LA models from CT images. We fitted regional model stiffness to peak CT-derived deformation during the LA reservoir phase ($pm0.90$ mm) and used the CT deformation transients through the reservoir and conduit phase for model validation (deformation transients fell within $pm0.38$ mm per unit time of targets). We found that myocardial stiffness varies regionally across the LA. The regional stiffness values were significant factors contributing to regional physiological LA deformation ($p=0.023$) while features of LA anatomy, including regional wall thickness and adipose volume, were less important. These findings provide insight into the underlying causes of altered LA biomechanics in AF.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Investigating how regional left atrial stiffness affects passive deformation
Understanding altered atrial biomechanics in atrial fibrillation patients
Determining factors influencing left atrial deformation beyond anatomy
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Created patient-specific left atrial models from CT
Fitted regional stiffness to CT-derived deformation data
Validated models using deformation transients through cardiac phases
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
T
Tiffany MG Baptiste
School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Science, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
Cristobal Rodero
Cristobal Rodero
Imperial College London
Cardiac ModellingIn-silico Clinical TrialsCardiac Simulation
C
Charles P Sillett
School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Science, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
Marina Strocchi
Marina Strocchi
National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
C
Christopher W Lanyon
School of Mathematical Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
C
Christoph M Augustin
Division of Medical Physics and Biophysics, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
A
Angela WC Lee
National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
J
José Alonso Solís-Lemus
National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
Caroline H Roney
Caroline H Roney
Queen Mary University of London
Cardiac ElectrophysiologyBiomedical EngineeringComputational Medicine
D
Daniel B Ennis
Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
R
Ronak Rajani
School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Science, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom; Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
C
Christopher A Rinaldi
School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Science, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom; Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
Gernot Plank
Gernot Plank
Medical University of Graz
computational cardiologycardiac modellingcardiac mechanics
R
Richard D Wilkinson
School of Mathematical Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
S
Steven E Williams
School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Science, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
S
Steven A Niederer
School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Science, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom; National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom; Alan Turing Institute, London, United Kingdom