🤖 AI Summary
Existing benchmarks struggle to accurately assess the post-training potential of large language models in complex open-ended scenarios, leading to inefficient model selection. This work proposes RuDE, a novel framework that introduces a 4C taxonomy and a contrastive discrimination mechanism to construct fine-grained violation-aligned contrastive samples based on explicit scoring criteria. By leveraging rule-driven contrast pair generation, response discrimination modeling, and reinforcement learning validation—without relying on the model’s generative capabilities—RuDE achieves high-precision prediction of post-training performance. The method demonstrates over 90% correlation with actual post-training outcomes, successfully identifying multiple high-performing smaller models and substantially improving model selection efficiency while conserving computational resources.
📝 Abstract
The performance of Large Language Models (LLMs) on downstream tasks is fundamentally constrained by the capabilities acquired during pre-training. However, traditional benchmarks like MMLU often fail to reflect a base model's plasticity in complex open-ended scenarios, leading to inefficient model selection. We address this by introducing a new task of predicting post-training potential - forecasting a base model's performance before post-training. We propose RuDE (Rubric-based Discriminative Evaluation), a unified framework that bypasses the generation gap of base models by leveraging response discrimination. Guided by our systematic 4C Taxonomy, RuDE constructs controlled contrastive pairs across diverse domains by fine-grained rubric violations. Extensive experiments demonstrate a correlation greater than 90% with post-training performance. Crucially, validation via Reinforcement Learning (RL) confirms that RuDE effectively identifies high-potential smaller models that outperform larger counterparts, offering a compute-efficient mechanism for foundation model development.