NEBULA: Do We Evaluate Vision-Language-Action Agents Correctly?

📅 2025-10-17
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF

career value

205K/year
🤖 AI Summary
Current evaluation of Vision-Language-Action (VLA) agents faces two key bottlenecks: (1) overreliance on coarse terminal task success rates, which impedes fine-grained diagnosis of specific capability deficits and robustness assessment under realistic perturbations; and (2) fragmented, nonstandardized benchmark data and interfaces, hindering reproducible research and generalizable model development. To address these, we propose NEBULA—a unified evaluation ecosystem for single-arm manipulation—introducing the first dual-axis protocol integrating *capability testing* (e.g., spatial reasoning, dynamic adaptation) and *stress testing* (e.g., illumination, viewpoint, occlusion variations) for precise, interpretable diagnostics. NEBULA provides standardized APIs and a large-scale, aggregated dataset enabling cross-dataset training and fair, apples-to-apples comparison. Experiments reveal significant deficiencies in core embodied capabilities across state-of-the-art VLA models, empirically validating NEBULA’s diagnostic depth and evaluation reliability.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
The evaluation of Vision-Language-Action (VLA) agents is hindered by the coarse, end-task success metric that fails to provide precise skill diagnosis or measure robustness to real-world perturbations. This challenge is exacerbated by a fragmented data landscape that impedes reproducible research and the development of generalist models. To address these limitations, we introduce extbf{NEBULA}, a unified ecosystem for single-arm manipulation that enables diagnostic and reproducible evaluation. NEBULA features a novel dual-axis evaluation protocol that combines fine-grained extit{capability tests} for precise skill diagnosis with systematic extit{stress tests} that measure robustness. A standardized API and a large-scale, aggregated dataset are provided to reduce fragmentation and support cross-dataset training and fair comparison. Using NEBULA, we demonstrate that top-performing VLAs struggle with key capabilities such as spatial reasoning and dynamic adaptation, which are consistently obscured by conventional end-task success metrics. By measuring both what an agent can do and when it does so reliably, NEBULA provides a practical foundation for robust, general-purpose embodied agents.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Evaluating Vision-Language-Action agents with coarse success metrics
Addressing fragmented data landscape hindering reproducible research
Measuring agent robustness to real-world perturbations systematically
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Unified ecosystem for diagnostic manipulation evaluation
Dual-axis protocol combining capability and stress tests
Standardized API with aggregated dataset reducing fragmentation