🤖 AI Summary
This paper addresses two fundamental problems: (1) the query complexity of estimating maximum matching size in an $n$-vertex graph via adjacency matrix queries, and (2) lower bounds on the computational complexity of Earth Mover’s Distance (EMD) estimation. Technically, the authors establish the first superlinear lower bound $Omega(n^{2-delta})$ for maximum matching estimation in the adjacency matrix query model, for any $delta > 0$, resolving a central open problem posed at STOC’24 and closing a long-standing gap between prior upper and lower bounds. Their proof integrates adversarial query complexity analysis, intricate graph-theoretic constructions, and a novel reduction from EMD estimation under the $(1,2)$-metric space assumption. As a consequence, the FOCS’23 algorithm for maximum matching estimation is shown to be asymptotically optimal, and the STOC’24 EMD estimation algorithm is proven to admit no substantial improvement in this setting.
📝 Abstract
How many adjacency matrix queries (also known as pair queries) are required to estimate the size of a maximum matching in an $n$-vertex graph $G$? We study this fundamental question in this paper.
On the upper bound side, an algorithm of Bhattacharya, Kiss, and Saranurak [FOCS'23] gives an estimate that is within $εn$ of the right bound with $n^{2-Ω_ε(1)}$ queries, which is subquadratic in $n$ (and thus sublinear in the matrix size) for any fixed $ε> 0$. On the lower bound side, while there has been a lot of progress in the adjacency list model, no non-trivial lower bound has been established for algorithms with adjacency matrix query access. In particular, the only known lower bound is a folklore bound of $Ω(n)$, leaving a huge gap.
In this paper, we present the first superlinear in $n$ lower bound for this problem. In fact, we close the gap mentioned above entirely by showing that the algorithm of [BKS'23] is optimal. Formally, we prove that for any fixed $δ> 0$, there is a fixed $ε> 0$ such that an estimate that is within $εn$ of the true bound requires $Ω(n^{2-δ})$ adjacency matrix queries.
Our lower bound also has strong implications for estimating the earth mover's distance between distributions. For this problem, Beretta and Rubinstein [STOC'24] gave an $n^{2-Ω_ε(1)}$ time algorithm that obtains an additive $ε$-approximation and works for any distance function. Whether this can be improved generally, or even for metric spaces, had remained open. Our lower bound rules out the possibility of any improvements over this bound, even under the strong assumption that the underlying distances are in a (1, 2)-metric.