About the job
In this role, you will help define how OpenAI’s models should behave in high-risk cybersecurity contexts. You will develop policy frameworks, threat models, taxonomies, evaluations, and behavioral specifications that guide model behavior across training, deployment, and monitoring systems. This role sits at the intersection of cybersecurity, AI safety, threat modeling, evaluation science, and policy implementation.
Responsibilities
Design and maintain model policies for cybersecurity and frontier-risk domains, especially dual-use and high-risk cyber capabilities.
Translate cybersecurity threat models into clear behavioral specifications, evaluation criteria, grading guidance, and system-level mitigations.
Define practical boundaries between legitimate security research, defensive workflows, and assistance that could materially enable harmful activity.
Build policy artifacts that support implementation across training, evaluation, deployment, monitoring, and escalation systems.
Partner with safety researchers, engineers, and evaluation teams to operationalize policies into scalable model behavior and measurable safeguards.
Analyze red-teaming results, deployment data, model failures, over-refusals, and ambiguous edge cases to improve policy and evaluation quality over time.
Identify emerging cyber capability areas where advanced AI systems could lower barriers to misuse or increase operational capability for malicious actors.
Contribute to system cards, safety reports, policy documentation, and external communications on OpenAI’s approach to cyber risk mitigation.
Qualifications
Minimum
Strong technical expertise in cybersecurity, such as offensive security, defensive security, vulnerability research, malware analysis, incident response, threat intelligence, application security, exploit development, infrastructure security, or cloud security.
Strong judgment about how AI systems may affect the cyber threat landscape, including dual-use, autonomous, or agentic system risks.
Ability to distinguish between legitimate security use cases and assistance that could materially enable harmful cyber activity.
Experience building or applying threat models to complex technical systems, especially in adversarial or high-risk environments.
Ability to translate technical security expertise into structured policy frameworks, evaluation criteria, operational guidance, and enforcement mechanisms.
Comfort using empirical evidence, including evaluations, red-teaming results, deployment observations, and model failure modes, to inform policy decisions.
Strong systems thinking across policy, evaluations, classifiers, training, deployment safeguards, measurement, and monitoring.
Ability to work cross-functionally with researchers, engineers, product teams, policy experts, and operational stakeholders.
Strong written communication skills, especially the ability to explain complex technical and security concepts clearly.
A pragmatic approach to safety: focused on reducing real-world risk while preserving legitimate, beneficial, and defensive uses of AI.
Preferred
No preferred qualifications listed.