Requirements for Aligned, Dynamic Resolution of Conflicts in Operational Constraints
Autonomous AI systems struggle to simultaneously satisfy procedural, legal, and ethical constraints in real-world environments, leading to decision-making dilemmas under conflicting norms. Method: We propose a dynamic decision-making framework that integrates normative, pragmatic, and contextual knowledge. It enables AI to autonomously generate candidate actions under constraint conflicts, evaluate them across multiple dimensions—including goal consistency and value alignment—and produce human-interpretable action justifications. Technically, the framework unifies multi-source knowledge reasoning, fine-grained situational understanding, and explainable planning—moving beyond limitations of end-to-end policy learning. Contribution/Results: This work is the first to systematically characterize the knowledge types and mechanisms required for compliant and reasonable decision-making in underspecified scenarios. Empirical evaluation demonstrates substantial improvements in behavioral planning robustness, contextual adaptability, and alignment with human values.