Institution profile

KNAW Humanities Cluster

Academic institutioneurope · nl
Official website
Research library1linked papers
Opportunities0open roles
Selected work

Representative Papers

Knowledge Graphs Generation from Cultural Heritage Texts: Combining LLMs and Ontological Engineering for Scholarly Debates

Nov 13, 2025

Unstructured discourse in cultural heritage (CH) texts poses significant challenges for transforming contested knowledge—particularly authenticity debates—into queryable, structured knowledge graphs (KGs). Method: This paper introduces ATR4CH, the first systematic methodology integrating large language models (LLMs)—including Claude Sonnet 3.7, Llama 3.3 70B, and GPT-4o-mini—with CH-specific ontologies via a five-stage pipeline: foundational analysis, annotation schema design, architecture implementation, integration optimization, and comprehensive evaluation. Contribution/Results: Evaluated on Wikipedia texts concerning contested cultural artifacts, ATR4CH achieves metadata F1-scores of 0.96–0.99 and evidence extraction F1-scores of 0.95–0.97. Notably, smaller LLMs deliver high performance with superior cost-efficiency. The framework enables cross-domain, multi-source KG construction while significantly enhancing both the retrievability and interpretability of CH knowledge.

0 citationsRead paper
Recent publications

Latest Papers

Knowledge Graphs Generation from Cultural Heritage Texts: Combining LLMs and Ontological Engineering for Scholarly Debates

Nov 13, 2025

Unstructured discourse in cultural heritage (CH) texts poses significant challenges for transforming contested knowledge—particularly authenticity debates—into queryable, structured knowledge graphs (KGs). Method: This paper introduces ATR4CH, the first systematic methodology integrating large language models (LLMs)—including Claude Sonnet 3.7, Llama 3.3 70B, and GPT-4o-mini—with CH-specific ontologies via a five-stage pipeline: foundational analysis, annotation schema design, architecture implementation, integration optimization, and comprehensive evaluation. Contribution/Results: Evaluated on Wikipedia texts concerning contested cultural artifacts, ATR4CH achieves metadata F1-scores of 0.96–0.99 and evidence extraction F1-scores of 0.95–0.97. Notably, smaller LLMs deliver high performance with superior cost-efficiency. The framework enables cross-domain, multi-source KG construction while significantly enhancing both the retrievability and interpretability of CH knowledge.

0 citationsRead paper