Self-Study Reconsidered: The Hidden Fragility of Learning from Self-Generated QA
This work addresses the vulnerability of self-generated question-answering (QA) as a training signal for language models, which is prone to selection bias and excessive compliance with embedded instructions. The study systematically reveals the model’s preferential selection of document evidence and its high adherence to implicit directives during self-generated QA. To mitigate these issues without altering the training pipeline, the authors propose lightweight interventions: fixing the questioning objective and filtering instruction-laden segments. Through comprehensive empirical evaluations—including multi-model comparisons, prompt diversity analysis, text coverage assessment, and instruction injection detection—the approach reduces average instruction compliance from 88% to 13% while preserving nearly all clean textual content. This significantly enhances the reliability and robustness of self-generated QA data for model training.