Institution profile

Colorado State University

Academic institutionnorthamerica · us
Official website
Research library200linked papers
Opportunities0open roles
Selected work

Representative Papers

Uniquely optimal codes of low complexity are symmetric

Aug 28, 2020arXiv.org

This study addresses the fundamental question of whether optimal codes in compact metric spaces necessarily exhibit symmetry, focusing on low-complexity uniquely optimal encodings. Method: Integrating tools from metric geometry, extremal combinatorics, and group action theory, we develop constructive coding design techniques, symmetry detection algorithms, and rigorous optimality proofs. Contribution/Results: We formulate and systematically verify the universal conjecture that every low-complexity uniquely optimal code admits a nontrivial symmetry. Through comprehensive case studies on canonical spaces—including the sphere and torus—we empirically and theoretically confirm that symmetry is a necessary condition for uniqueness and optimality under low complexity constraints. Our work establishes, for the first time, a deep structural connection between the geometry of the underlying metric space and the symmetry properties of its optimal codes. This yields novel principled guidance for efficient encoding design, advancing both theoretical understanding and practical construction of optimal codes in geometric settings.

3 citationsRead paper

What do Geometric Hallucination Detection Metrics Actually Measure?

Feb 09, 2026

Existing geometric hallucination detection metrics struggle to distinguish specific hallucination types in the absence of ground truth and are highly sensitive to domain shifts. This work addresses these limitations by constructing a synthetic dataset to systematically evaluate the capacity of various geometric statistics to capture key hallucination attributes—such as output correctness, relevance, and coherence—and reveals that different metrics align with distinct hallucination types. Furthermore, the study proposes a simple yet effective normalization strategy that substantially mitigates the impact of domain shift. Experimental results demonstrate that, under multi-domain settings, the proposed approach improves AUROC by 34 percentage points, significantly enhancing the cross-domain robustness of geometric hallucination detection metrics.

1 citationsRead paper

Dynamic Epistemic Friction in Dialogue

Jun 12, 2025

This work addresses the cognitive resistance to belief updating in human–agent collaborative dialogue, introducing the concept of “dynamic cognitive friction”—a systematic resistance to integrating novel, conflicting, or ambiguous external evidence with preexisting beliefs. Methodologically, it formalizes cognitive friction for the first time within a dynamic epistemic logic (DEL) framework as a nontrivial belief revision process, constructs a quantifiable friction model grounded in belief alignment metrics, and integrates formal belief revision theory with empirical dialogue analysis. Evaluated in embodied collaborative tasks, the model successfully predicts belief update trajectories observed in real human–agent dialogues. It significantly improves modeling accuracy and explanatory power for complex interactive cognitive dynamics. The approach provides a novel theoretical framework and quantitative foundation for interpretable human–agent collaboration.

1 citationsRead paper
Recent publications

Latest Papers