Can Vision-Language Models Assess Proxemic Risk from Egocentric Robot Images?
This study addresses the challenge of assessing proxemic danger in human environments from a robot’s first-person perspective to enhance embodied navigation safety. We evaluate the performance of three vision-language models—InternVL, Qwen-VL, and SmolVLM—on a four-class proximity risk classification task, systematically comparing multiple prompting strategies and two rounds of QLoRA fine-tuning. We further analyze the relationship between models’ spatial localization capabilities and their risk judgment accuracy. Results show that unmodified models perform near random baseline levels; while overall gains from fine-tuning remain modest, Qwen-VL combined with advanced prompting significantly improves recall in high-risk scenarios. Our findings highlight current limitations of vision-language models in fine-grained proxemic reasoning and spatial grounding, demonstrate that targeted prompting can effectively mitigate model deficiencies, and reveal that correct risk classification does not necessarily rely on accurate spatial attention.