Dull, Dirty, Dangerous: Understanding the Past, Present, and Future of a Key Motivation for Robotics
The robotics field has long invoked “dull, dirty, and dangerous” (DDD) tasks as a primary motivation for technological deployment, yet it has largely neglected to define DDD explicitly or provide concrete task examples, thereby hindering deeper understanding of human–robot labor dynamics. This study systematically examines robotics literature from 1980 to 2024 that references DDD, integrating empirical insights from social science on DDD work through bibliometric analysis and interdisciplinary review. We construct a labor-context-oriented framework for evaluating robotic technologies and find that only 2.7% of surveyed papers define DDD, and merely 8.7% offer specific task instances. The proposed framework offers the robotics community a novel perspective for assessing the socio-technical implications of automation, fostering more responsible and socially grounded technological development.