Cascading versus Joint Modeling for Hierarchical Offensive Language Detection
This study investigates the trade-offs between cascaded modeling and joint multi-task modeling for fine-grained offensive language detection, focusing on accuracy, parameter count, and inference latency, while optimizing class-imbalance handling strategies for each subtask. We construct a three-stage cascade system with tailored training protocols per stage and employ ablation studies to identify the optimal imbalance mitigation approach. A shared-encoder joint model serves as a baseline, enabling the first controlled quantitative comparison between the two paradigms. Results show that the cascade achieves macro F1 scores of 0.795, 0.716, and 0.557 across the three subtasks, outperforming the joint model by 7.1 points on the most imbalanced task, albeit with three times more parameters and 1.67× higher latency. Ablation analysis further reveals that approximately 20% of cascade errors originate in the first stage and are irrecoverable, underscoring the critical impact of pipeline design.