No One to Blame: A Framework of Constitutive AI Unaccountability
This study addresses the structural accountability gaps engendered by autonomous AI systems, which elude conventional accountability mechanisms. It introduces the concept of “constitutive AI unaccountability,” framing unaccountability not as a failure to be remedied but as an inherent property of sociotechnical systems, thereby extending existing theories of accountability barriers. Through a three-phase qualitative investigation—comprising concept-driven literature analysis, secondary analysis of interviews with 27 experts, and application of the emerging framework to the open-source system OpenClaw—the research identifies nine categories encompassing twenty constitutive unaccountability themes and maps eight interdependencies among them. The authors develop an operational diagnostic instrument comprising twenty targeted questions, which successfully detected seventeen unaccountability conditions in OpenClaw, offering a novel paradigm for evaluating accountability in AI systems.